August 20, 2014

The fundamentalist Islamist terror threat

Following news of today’s murder of a kidnapped US journalist by Islamic State (IS) terrorists, I’ve seen several comments that IS poses a real threat to our security, yada yada yada.  As a matter of fact, IS as such isn’t much of a threat at this time.  It’s busy trying to establish control over the territory in Syria and Iraq that it’s annexed (at least temporarily) into its so-called ‘Caliphate’.  Its main tool in doing so is terrorism, because it has no infrastructure set up and few (if any) trained, experienced administrators in its ranks.  It can only try to cow the conquered towns and villages in its domain into compliance with its wishes.

However, the loose alliance between fundamentalist Islamic terror groups in different nations is a different matter.  As the President of Somalia said last week:

Boko Haram, Al-Shabaab, all of them, these are terrorist organizations — they are linked, they live for each other, they support each other and they are connected globally,” President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud told PJM in an exclusive interview on Friday. “It’s not just an issue of one country or one region — it’s a global phenomenon that needs to be addressed globally.”

“That’s why at the regional and continental level the African Union is supporting Somalia and, globally, that’s why the United States is supporting the African Union to support Somalia and defeat these terrorists,” Mohamud added.

. . .

“Al-Shabaab is a group based on an ideology, and we all know that ideologies have no citizenship and have no boundaries,” he said.

“Al-Shabaab is Somali for one reason only — they operate in Somalia, they have their base in Somalia, they have training camps in Somalia.” And, he added, they ably use Somalia as a transit hub for terrorists, linking Asia and Africa — “the terrorists move here and there.”

“And these organizations, although they have different names, they’re all linked in some way or another.”

The president stressed to the crowd the concern of Al-Shabaab and Nigeria’s Boko Haram training together even though they’re physically a continent apart.

“There are more non-Somalis than Somalis at the highest level” of Al-Shabaab now, he said. “We have people from North America, people from Europe, people from Asia, the Gulf… we have all kinds of people in place but still Somalia has the name associated with Al-Shabaab.”

There’s more at the link.

I have personal experience of this.  In South Africa during the 1980′s, certain Muslim individuals of a more militant persuasion went to Afghanistan to join the mujahedin in fighting the Soviet occupiers.  When some of them came home, they helped to form PAGAD (People Against Gangsterism and Drugs), which rapidly degenerated into a criminal and terrorist organization.  Other, primarily Shi’ite Muslim fundamentalists formed Qibla, modeled after the Iranian revolution and aligned with Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations.  I had run-ins with both of them, some of which got rather … er … exciting.  Let’s just say that I’m not exactly a novice at dealing with militant Muslims.

I think it’s highly likely that IS will establish (probably has already established) liaison with groups such as Boko Haram, Al-Shabaab, and similar organizations around the world.  Don’t forget the growth of fundamentalist Islamic activity in the area where the borders of Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina meet – so much so that it’s been called ‘the Muslim triangle’ by some sources.  (See this 1994 Seattle Times report for an indication of how long the area has been under investigation.)  I think it’s highly likely that terrorists and their sympathizers, fund-raisers and other supporters have already entered the USA from that area, or through the joke that is our southern border security at present.  I wouldn’t be surprised to find plans afoot to smuggle more terrorists and their weapons into the USA right now.

We’re frighteningly unprepared for a major terrorist attack.  The Department of Homeland Security is a joke – I don’t think it has a hope in hell of detecting, let alone preventing, an attack by determined terrorists with even a modicum of security-consciousness.  The TSA is absolutely useless – security theater at its most futile.  A few DHS agencies such as the Coast Guard do a good job, but they’re starved of manpower and resources.  I think it’ll be risibly easy for terrorists to strike hard – and there are many vulnerable targets for them to choose.  My personal greatest fear is that they’ll bring a Beslan-type massacre to our shores, and perhaps in more than one place at once.  If they attacked up to a dozen elementary or middle schools across the country on the same day, the carnage would be immense and the impact of their terrorism magnified beyond their wildest dreams.  (I’m not breaching security by saying this, or giving them ideas – we know it’s already been discussed in terrorist circles.)

I have to add that for me, an equally great fear remains the unthinking, knee-jerk classification of all Muslims as potential terrorists by so many Americans.  Most people have very little idea what they’re talking about when it comes to Islam;  and even those who parrot what they regard as “proof” in the form of verses from the Koran, or demand that those of us with more sense refute their pedantic, pejorative accusations on their terms (which are usually ridiculous), are at best ill-informed.  Very few of them have the education, intellectual resources and experience of Islam in a wider context to properly understand it, as I’ve pointed out before.  However, if a major Muslim fundamentalist terror attack takes place on US soil, I fear that logic and reason will be ignored yet again.  If we paint all Muslims in the same shade of “terrorist red”, it’s more than likely that even the (many) moderates among them (such as, for example, the President of Somalia, quoted above) will, in their anger and bitterness, end up supporting the radicals because we’ve driven them to it.  Wild talk of converting entire Muslim nations into “a radioactive glass-topped parking lot” with nuclear weapons is a good start to doing precisely that.

The world is a far more complex and multi-hued place than most of us can possibly imagine.  In our (entirely legitimate) outrage at terrorism and our determination to stop it at any cost, let’s not “throw the baby out with the bathwater” and do things that prejudice or negate our own constitution and civil liberties, or risk alienating a quarter of the world’s population because we refuse to think before we emotionally react.

Peter

Bushcraft 101… A book review

Dave Canterbury is arguably one of the most popular survival instructors in the general public eye. This is in no small part due to the popularity of his role as one of the original co-stars of Discovery channel’s “Dual Survival” and his online videos. With the success of his school and personalized products, along with his breadth of knowledge, writing a book was a natural progression for Canterbury.
“Bushcraft 101, a Field Guide to the Art of Wilderness Survival”, authored by Dave Canterbury, is yet another book to enter the survival community, but when one opens to the title page, one is greeted with a long list of topics, some common and others not so common in this type of book.

Unfortunately, this long list is the detriment of the book. In an effort to squeeze as much information as possible between the pages, many of the sections were left lacking. Many times, it seemed topics were just given a cursory overview, simply for the purpose of inclusion, but did little in the way of teaching.

The post Bushcraft 101… A book review appeared first on outdoor self reliance.

^Top
© 2014 - Self Reliance News
Newsframe Theme by Edward R. Jenkins